Like Duncan says, I don't think that the plagiarism event was particularly harmful to Durham's reputation; it was just one bad apple and there's no evidence that it was systemic.
When deciding between the Warwick and Durham programs, be sure to connect with the schools themselves and ask them about student career arcs: these can give you a general sense of what you can expect. The capacity of their respective career services departments will probably make a difference. I know Warwick has been working to make its student intranet, my.wbs, a hub for networking with alumni - this might help with landing a job post-graduation.
Also, even though Warwick is more expensive, don't let the sticker price fool you: they usually offer quite a few scholarships that cover about half of the first year's tuition, in addition to other financial aid options.
Nonetheless, both are good programs. Maybe some current students like georgep will weigh in with their experiences.
Hi Christian, Thanks for offering to post your experience on the Durham Global MBA program. Please continue to post your experience on it as your progress with your course. I have seen reviews by George who has also contributed on this thread, but would be keen to hear a second perspective. As I outline elsewhere, I am seriously considering the Durham MBA as opposed to the Warwick one, because of the cost, and the limited times required to travel. Plus Durham impressed me as an equally top university, perhaps not quite in the same breath as Oxbridge, but not far off. If you have been in contact with past Durham Global MBA alumni, it would be good to hear their perspective too. I am planning to start in October, or early next year. I haven?t ruled out Warwick completely yet, because every endorsement says it?s the best programme to be on. And my heart says Warwick too, but Durham impresses me and really don't want to waste the extra 6 grand in tuition plus more in travel from Down Under here when there is a suitable alternative which isnt too bad.
There was some somewhat bad reviews on the DBS here though, regarding a dean who plagiarised. When I read the story I didn?t see what the fuss was about; it was in 2007, and apparently the dean committed the academic crime in the late eighties. How much of this is an issue over there though. I don?t suppose it is, but just need to know. Thanks, Hudson